I'm so frustrated and need to vent about it:
I'm the commissioner of a Fantasy Football league. Every year, we get the gang together and trash talk our way through the season. One thing that I do, though, is constantly try to get a lot of involvement in the league: people trading, people posting, people getting together to watch games. I believe it adds more to the league over all to have high involvement.
Last year, early in the season I saw a team struggling in last place and sent a lengthy e-mail to try and lend whatever insight I thought I had into their team so they could improve and catch up with the rest of the league. Well, he didn't reply for many many weeks and when he finally did, he told me that he was angry at me for trying to make him drop good players so that I could pick them up. I was flabergasted - I had good intentions that I had wrestled with and he took it differently, but instead of coming to me, he stewed. He also stated that he told his friends about it and they agreed with him. So, he had a whole army of people of one misunderstood opinion before going to the source. Things have never been the same between us since - he doesn't come to any of our get togethers, but gets upset when we don't come to his last minute get togethers (one stands out in my mind - I planned a Saturday get together and then he planned one on the same Saturday sending out the email on the Thursday prior).
Anyway, my newest beef with Fantasy Football is this: I've been trying to get my league to trade more and I posted a message on our forums about the subject. See, I had tried to get trades accomplished last week but kept hearing the same thing: "well, the player I have is ranked higher than that". Our site allows you to get a list of Top Performers that shows total points scored for the year (by default, that is. You can change this to show other things too). The other owners were going by this list as a ranking which is not accurate. A ranking is when intelligent decisions are made of a player's future impact using many factors such as past performance, injury status, future matchups, changes in team philosophy, teammate injuries, etc. For example, let's say I have a player that has the highest point total thus far this year, but he blew out his ACL last week. It would be stupid to keep him, regardless of his point total because he won't be playing the rest of the season!
Here's another example - let's say you have a QB that averages 24 points per game through the first 5 games and he has not had his bye week already. Now, you have another QB that averages 23 points per game who has had his bye week already. Which QB is better? Tough call - if you have a good QB backup, QB one is better because you can play your backup during his bye week. But, if you're bench is useless, then QB 2 is better. Why? Well, QB one gets 24 points per game but has 11 games left which totals 264 points over the rest of the season. QB two gets 23 points per game and has 12 games left which totals 276 points over the rest of the season which is 12 points better than QB one. Again, though, if you can get a fill in QB that makes at least 12 points for your QB one bye week, then stick with QB one.
I also attempted a trade with a team that would have benefited both of our teams by about 5 points per week - this is because a trade only makes sense if it helps BOTH teams. But, the team owner denied it. Weekly averages don't mean future results, but are more accurate over a season than a grand total that doesn't take bye weeks into consideration. I posted the following message to our Fantasy Football forum:
Sure, it looks like Super Mutts are FAR in the lead with 590 points over all, but what you may not see is that the weekly averages are much much closer. So, if you can eke out another 10 points per week, it can make all the difference in the world. For example, I had Bulger on my bench last week with 34 points - if I'd started him in place of Favre, that's a 25 points difference which would've been an extra 5 points per week over the first 5 weeks and bumped my weekly average up to 115.0 - right behind SuperMutts.
118.0 Super Mutts
110.0 Fandingos
105.4 Bradford Brutes
102.6 Rando's Commandos
102.4 Dastardly Shizzles
97.8 Shawnee Rhinoceros
85.6 Gravy Train
Trades that help you get a few more points each week can be the difference between 6th place and 3rd place (which gets a trophy). Keep that in mind when thinking about trades. One player may be GREAT, but it's the TEAM that needs to perform well to get you to the top. Tait
Now, on first glance, you can see that I may be interested in trading for myself - absolutely! I try hard to get the best team possible. However, I am fair and always attempt to find a trade that is beneficial to both parties. I don't take advantage of other people. Honestly, if I did, I could do better because I could've just traded with people based on their perception that total points equals ranking and ran off with great players. But, I didn't - I try to help make the league competetive. It's just what I do - I'm interested in winning, but only in a competetive fashion.
Honestly, though, sometimes I don't know why I bother. Some people in my friends group are so sardonic and pessimistic that they always think the other person is out to get them with any offered advice. It appears to be completely incomprehensible that someone wants to get better through improving the team rather than trying to control others and take advantage of them. It's sad, really.
I'll give an example from an XBox game called Halo - now, in my circle of friends, I'm the best Halo player. However, when we've played with other people in the past, I've learned that I'm not that good over all - just in my circle of friends. Do I gloat and take pride in the fact that I'm the best in our circle? Overall, no - I want to get better. I don't want to settle for that, I want to improve. The only way to improve, though, is with challenge. So, my options are:
Be proud of being the best in my group
Be obnoxiously proud of being the best in my group
Find a new group that's better so I can learn to be better
Help my group improve - as they get better, I'll get better
I choose option 4 - I want to get better, but with my friends. I want them to get better. I don't want to triumph over them over and over now - it's too easy. But, when I give them pointers on how to improve their game, they don't listen. Or, if they hear, they don't apply - some of them are about the same level now as they were a year ago. It's frustrating - I want to improve, but not at the expense of others - I want us all to get better.
I'm constantly trying to get better - if I'm struggling at something, I'll go buy a book or read on the Internet to figure out how to accomplish what I'm attempting. I don't like losing, so it raises my competetive spirit to a new level and I learn. I'm not seeing that in my friends group - they complain about losing, but don't work to win. Arrrgh!
So, back to Fantasy Football - after my post, I get a reply post:
That Tait.. always looking out for our best interests. I'm sure he's not trying to justify why we should trade our best players to him. I think he just wants other people to win.
Wow - sarcasm and an accusation (again) that I'm only interested in myself and have no interest in helping others improve. Totally missed the point and improperly put together the facts to form an opinion as sardistic as ever. *sigh*